Require local governments to follow court orders ending unlawful sanctuary policies within 120 days.

HB2219 requires county sheriffs to enter into agreements under the federal 287(g) program (the DHS program that deputizes local officers to assist with federal immigration enforcement), expands the statutory powers of the Tennessee Corrections Institute board of control, and tightens enforcement against so‑called sanctuary policies by removing the statutory 90‑day minimum compliance period for court orders (leaving local entities up to 120 days to comply). In practice, every county sheriff would be directed by state law to participate in a formal partnership with federal immigration authorities, creating a statewide baseline of local–federal cooperation. The change to the sanctuary‑policy enforcement timeline means courts can require faster compliance from municipalities or counties found to be maintaining unlawful sanctuary practices.

From a conservative, originalist perspective, HB2219 leans into state sovereignty and the rule of law: it uses state authority to require local cooperation with federal immigration enforcement when the federal government’s performance is judged insufficient. Those are proper uses of state police power under the Tenth Amendment. At the same time, the bill creates an operational dependency on a federal program (287(g)), expands administrative authority over corrections without detail in the enacted text presented here, and shortens the window local governments have to come into compliance — all of which raise practical, legal, and civil‑liberties questions that bear watching.