TLRC position
Oppose
2025 · Abortion
Redefines abortion exceptions, weakening Tennessee’s pro-life protections.
HB 0990 / SB 1004
Bill description
Require annual reports to the House and Senate speakers on donations and remaining funds for the state capitol monument.
AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4; Title 9; Title 29; Title 33; Title 37; Title 38; Title 39; Title 40; Title 53; Title 56; Title 62; Title 63; Title 68 and Title 71, relative to abortion.
Bill sponsors
House co-sponsors · 1
Esther Helton-Haynes R
Senate co-sponsors · 2
Joey Hensley R, Todd Gardenhire R
TLRC statement
This bill undermines Tennessee’s strong pro-life laws by introducing ambiguous language into the legal framework governing abortion exceptions. The bill amends TCA §39-15-213 to define “inevitable abortion” as a condition under which abortion may be considered legally permissible. This language introduces subjective medical standards that create broad interpretive loopholes in a law that previously held clear and strong protections for unborn life.
The term "inevitable abortion", newly defined in this bill, is loosely described as a dilation of the cervix before viability due to preterm labor or cervical insufficiency. This vague definition invites subjective medical judgment and opens the door for discretionary abortion decisions, even in cases where life-threatening conditions may not be present. The bill also expands the definition of "serious risk of substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function", adding a list of medical conditions that, while serious, lack the life-threatening clarity required for abortion exceptions under current law.
Tennessee’s existing pro-life statutes already include protections for the life of the mother and do not criminalize necessary emergency medical care. The amendment weakens these laws by introducing unnecessary legal gray areas, potentially allowing abortions in cases where they were not previously permitted, and inviting legal and political reinterpretation of pro-life protections in future challenges.
This bill represents a significant step backward in Tennessee’s efforts to defend life. By creating ambiguity where clarity is critical, it invites abuse of medical discretion and judicial reinterpretation, eroding one of the strongest pro-life legal frameworks in the country.


